【王承略】禮學視域的演變與《家語》偽一包養網站書說的興起

作者:

分類:

requestId:684d911971c947.75444365.

The evolution of the domain of tribute and the rise of the “Family” discourse

Author: Wang Chengluo

Source: “Confucius Research Institute” WeChat public number

Time: Confucius was in the 2571 year of Xinchou Xuanyue Gengxu

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    href=”https://twlovedating520.com/”>Baocai.comHome Language” and the “New Awareness of Chinese Civilization” high-end academic forum were held at the Confucius Institute. Wang Chengluo, an advanced research institute of Shandong Confucianism, published a speech on the purpose of “Tang people’s comments on “Confucian Family’s 大官网”, and selected the “transformation of the field of gifted learning and the rise of the “Family” speech” to treat readers.

 

 

 

The Song people’s understanding of “Family” Yichen has a thousand-strong connection with the scholarship. However, with the evolution of the academic field of gifts itself, the style of gifts in the Song Dynasty became much different from the Tang Dynasty. The focus on “Family” also shifted from the gift system dispute formed by internal discrimination in classics to the sub-parts of “The Doctrine of the Mean” originally belonged to “The Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Here we need to give a brief description of the development and changes of the Tang and Song dynasties and the overall characteristics of the Song dynasty.

 

Before and after the “Three Gifts” commentary, Zheng Xuan’s gift was challenged by all parties. First, Wei Zheng arranged the “Travels” from the beginning, “reacles according to categories”, and wrote twenty volumes of “Travels”. Baozhuang In Wei Zheng’s eyes, the “Three Gifts” are no longer a sacred and uninvasive saints, but can be adapted into practical texts of the book. Later, Yuan Xingyu made a statement on the “Classic Gift” and almost followed the order. It can be seen that the similar insights of gift learning were very receptive at that time. During the reign of Emperor Xuanzong of Tang, he wrote the “Six Dictations of Tang” to replace the “Zhou Lu” and the “Original Gift” to replace the “Yuan Gift”. As for the “Travel Notes”, the practical “Monthly Order” was later changed to be listed as the first article. So the three “Travels” were completely eliminated.”

 

Zheng Xuanrong’s daily life was rigid and westernized in the Tang Dynasty, because it was difficult to answer the problems of systemic and morality faced by the real society. As Teacher Ge Zhaoguang said: “When mainstream knowledge and thinking gradually disappeared into the diagnosis and diagnosis of social problems at that time Saving talents also falls to the interpretation and criticism of the problems of the universe and life, and often comes into strange phenomena: on the one hand, it is turned into a form of cognitive cognition that cannot be doubted, and on the other hand, it gradually falls into a kind of cognitive knowledge that cannot be lost to thinking. It is just a matter of using political rights. href=”https://twsugargirl.org/”>inclusive love and secular goodness, maintaining its attractiveness to the cognitive layer, and in a complete set of exquisite and beautiful language skills, the cognitive layer is surprisingly strong and surprising, maintaining its production and short-term fertilizationreproduction, just like Emperor Xuanzong of Tang himself said, “the questioning words are based on the chapter, and the words are said in a broad sense, href=”https://sites.google.com/view/sugargirl-story-share”>官网 is often mocking. ’” Zheng Xuan based on “Zhou Lu”, combining the “Three Gifts” to integrate the “Three Gifts” and integrate the contradiction between the community. The gift system constructed is a subtle reflection of the academic text. When the internal learning cannot provide sufficient resources to respond to the full amount of resources to raise a monthly price博文, “From the Middle Tang Dynasty, the standardized foundation of the tribute gradually changed from classical to dictatorship and righteousness”, “the structure of the classical ancient system (during the Northern Song Dynasty) was finally bound by Zhu Xi into the Song representative system of “Tender is reason”.

 

The study of the Song people often had the open colors of doubt, confusion and pronunciation. Pi Xi Rui called the Song Dynasty “Study ChangeBaocai Sweetheart NetworkAncient times”, the Song people built a new academic paradigm by skeptical and denying Han Tang’s old notes; on the other hand, they actively came from Bao’s Including but not limited to Confucian historical texts, we find a basis for the value of many texts, and re-evaluate the value of many texts. Wang Bai’s “Family” says that it was produced by the interaction between the rituals and the skeptical trends of thought.

 

Before Wang Bai, the Song people always had some ideas about “Family”Baoqing.com doubts, if Mr. Wan believes that “Kang Liuzi” is the first lunar calendarIn the year, Wang Shiyuan wrote and mentioned other “sad books” in “Family Books”: “In the past, Wang Shi published “Confucius’ Family Books”, and Qiu Jun explained the “State” in the later years and retreated to Korea.” They were all inferior. “How can I know that all scholars are not as good as this?” Fan Jun pointed out that “Family Words” is not reliable, “The worldly version of “Confucius Family Words” and “The virtues of the Five Emperors” and “The Emperor’s surnames are called.”, are not ancient books, so they can express their sincere words. href=”https://twsugardiary.com/Lynn/2020/02/01/%e6%88%91%e5%9c%a8%e7%94%9c%e5%bf%83%e8%8a%b1%e5%9c%92%e9%81%87%e8%a6%8b%e6%9c%80%e5%be%8c%e4%b8%80%e5%80%8b%e5%8c%85%e9%a4%8a%e5%b0%8d%e8%b1%a1/”>官网 href=”https://twbabydating99.com/”>Baozhuang Message Board “There are some notes that “Zhou Rong” is not the book of Zhou Gong Summary 1, and “Family Words” is not the book of Kong’s family. The classics are a little far away from ancient times and doubt that they are doubted in later generations. The five books do not believe in them, but are not the other ones… I hope to agree with you and stop seeing them with superb views.” In summary, there are three important sources of thought that aroused the Song people’s suspicion that “Family Book” is a “sacred book”. The above three examples point to one: First, descendants have a good rest, without makeup, just a “filling” gift, Ye Liubai’s deeds, second, a criticism of “Family Book” that continued the dispute between Zheng and Wang Rongzhi, and third, a very suspicious learning style of the Song Dynasty. The three kinds of thinking and resource interweaving form the Song people’s doubts about the authenticity of “Family” are absolutely perfect.

 

But from the whole point of view, “Family” is still a mainstream conclusion. On t


留言

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *